Digital Biographer™

A Kaplan survey of 320 admissions officers from the United States’ “top colleges and universities” revealed that one out of ten admissions officers has visited an applicant’s social networking Web site as part of the admissions decision-making process.

It’s not all bad news, of course – 25% of those surveyed said that viewing social network content had a positive impact on their evaluation. However, a greater percentage (38 percent) report that applicants’ social networking sites have generally had a negative impact on their admissions evaluation.

“The social networking frontier is a bit like the Wild West for colleges and universities — everyone is trying to figure out how to navigate it,” said Jeff Olson, Executive Director of Research for Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions. “The vast majority of schools we surveyed said they have no official policies or guidelines in place regarding visiting applicants’ social networking web sites — nor are they considering plans to develop them.” For schools who reported having a policy, generally the policy is not to look at or factor these sites into the evaluation. One admissions officer reported, “Staff can visit them for narrowly defined reasons, but can’t go on a fishing expedition.”

Kaplan conducted similar surveys at business (9%), law (15%) and medical schools (14%), and it is interesting to note that there have been a whole series of ‘clean’ online-profile-building services appearing, which of course, are specifically designed for the college admissions process, and significantly, over a quarter of survey respondents (26 percent) say their schools subscribe to one or more of these sites.

Examples of these sites include Admish.com, Cappex.com, EdSoup.com and Zinch.com.

So it looks like college kids don’t have to worry too much about what material they place on Facebook or MySpace (yet) but they should certainly throw together a profile on a college admissions profile site to boost their chances of admission to their preferred schools. At the same time , it seems that there are a lot of institutions out there who need to draw up a policy of some sort (even if it’s a blanket ‘no online screening from social media’), otherwise they may lay themselves open to claims of bias or discrimination.

These related posts may interest you:

1. More than one in five employers will screen your social media profiles before they decide on hiring you.
   Twenty-two percent of hiring managers said they use social networking sites to research job candidates, up from 11 percent in 2006, according to a nationwide survey of more than 3,100 employers from...
2. Social Media Management Fees, Authority Blogging and Calling yourself Names…
   Two terms have come to my attention in the last 24 hours. One was “Social Media Management Fees“, the other “Authority Blogging“. Social Media Management Fees Yes. The term makes sense, now...
3. 5 Ways Small Business Can Benefit From Social Media/Networking Sites
   Sometimes, someone just writes something so apt, concise and useful, you want to just say “read this”. So – read this! 5 Ways Small Business Can Benefit From Social Media/Networking Sites which...
4. Marketers wake up to social networking, but they still don’t smell the coffee.
   Originally published 15th January 2008, written for Ecademy Chairman Thomas Power. The significance of social networks is now starting to become obvious to the marketing departments of larger companies, largely due to...
5. Google quietly launches free viral social network. It’s called Reader.
   Google Reader is a free (and excellent) tool to let you manage your web feeds – to easily keep track of your favorite websites and see all the updates in one convenient...